Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150502135511/@comment-25186034-20150503145340

Blueeighthnote wrote:

Extremely hard seems to be the best option available.

Although, now we will have 5 types of "hard" difficulty - not really bothersome, but looks a little bit unbalanced. But we really do not need another rating for levels in the Easy range. I don't think so. The problem is the pages don't list the main index for judging the difficulty (same as CCSS). Adding the extremely hard can't solve this problem.