Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150812013021/@comment-26235098-20150812233804

3primetime3 wrote:

A blog post didn't show what you stated. Many people already voted support when Catinthedark wrote a blog post for "voting." Ok wait.

For the purpose of clarity, I clearly wrote a blog post for "nomination" not voting. This is my blog post: User_blog:Catinthedark/Nomination_for_Admin_-_I_need_your_support It was entitled "Nomination for Admin - I need your support. Moreover I stated in the text of the post For nomination, I need a letter of recommendation by an admin, plus a word of support by four other users giving their reasons. An admin has offered to write me a recommendation, but I need four more people to support me before I can apply. I think that's pretty clear. Now if more than four folks want to show support, I don't see anything wrong with that - it can be their choice, but their choice shouldn't be attributed to my talking about voting (which I didn't) nor even really to the process, since my post made it clear I hadn't even applied yet.

3primetime3 wrote:

How many non-ranked people have logged on yesterday and seen this post? Probably at least fifty. And how many commented? ZERO. Even admins ignored this post. How are we going to encourage non-ranked users to vote? 7 right now seems steep for me, but this can easily be changed if we can get users to respond.

If I may, I think it is hard to show stance when two bureaucrats are clearly brainstorming. It seems better to let you guys discuss, debate, and perhaps come up with ways to blend your ideas...

I am saying, I don't know that this is being ignored so much as maybe people don't have much to add or don't know what to say... maybe want to wait until things seem to firm up a bit more...

I'm answering things in sections ... things are getting long/unwieldy.