Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150502135511/@comment-3225604-20150504103620

3primetime3 wrote:

I think the difficulty rankings are fine as is. We have insanely hard and very hard, which cover "extremely hard."

I disagree with you. How can you explain the long-debated past version of level 181 or level 347 or level 445? You can see there's a loophole in today's existing system.