Thread:Top Agent PGG jr./@comment-26235098-20150714055029

Hi again PGG,

This sentence is in a lot of levels, so I want to talk about our cross-over edits:

"The moonscale is unstable from cascades."

This sentence as it stands relates an active state: it does not talk about a predisposition. It 1) implies that the user has already caused more than one cascade (as though a game were currently ongoing), and 2) asserts that the moonscale, as a result of the cascades that just happened, has lost stability -- not even that it has toppled, but that it cannot stay still! This clearly is not the meaning we want to convey.

Whenever I find that phrasing, I change it to say, "The moonscale is unstable for cascades." This is grammatically correct and means that the moonscale is not stable enough to sustain cascades, i.e., if you generate a cascade, Odus is likely to fall.

In one level, I saw that you changed just that one word back after my edit, so I thought I should alert you, since this phrasing is in several levels. If you were trying to say something different, then let me know, and we'll iron out the phrasing better. Otherwise, if we just want to warn the player that it isn't safe to cause cascades, we do need to say for and not from. ;) 