Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150606084624/@comment-3225604-20150609054718

3primetime3 wrote: Wildoneshelper wrote:

I also think that if the admin has so few edits and only "dedicates" to the wiki. I think he may have difficulty in dealing with vandalism since he is less likely to know a lot about CCS. At the use time, he may be very inexperienced in the wiki.

An edit count isn't always the most reliable way to judge a user. Imamadmad is a blatant exception to this rule. She doesn't have the mainspace edits mentioned in your forum post, but we both support her in being an admin here.

Sorry if I have typed wrongly, but the edit count isn't one of the measurable ways to see how much the user has contributed. To judge a user whether s/he has contributed a lot to the wiki, it has to be objective. To me, edit count is one of the objective ways to tell how much s/he has contributed to the wiki. Of course, there are other factors which tell how much s/he has contributed to the wiki.

And I would disagree with your example. Imamadmad is not blatantly an exception here. Her bot has contributed more than 3000 edits. Since her bot is a part of Imamadmad, we should count it as well. That makes Imamadmad eligible to be an admin.