Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20160106132717/@comment-26235098-20160111034128

52.27.76.164 wrote: I would heighten it to 10 votes instead of 6. I still think 20 is too many. 7/10 looks pretty good. We also never know if there is a "thinning of the herd" at any time.

Howabout 15? It remains a pretty big community, even when 'thinned'. I think 10 is still too few.

52.27.76.164 wrote: However, I'm afraid of IP users counting at the moment due to sockpuppets, users randomly posting oppose because he feels like it, etc. However, if an IP address has been contributing here for a long time, maybe. Yes this is a concern. Should we consider limiting to registered users? That's mostly who replies to threads anyway, and excluding IPs would prevent sockpuppeting.

52.27.76.164 wrote: About the different stances a user can give, may I only propose only support or oppose? If a user is undecided, the neutral should be used, but it should not affect the support or oppose rate, OR the 10 users under voting. If the user doesn't know the one under voting, then he/she does not vote! :) The other stance templates shouldn't be used. Agree 100%.