User blog:Wildoneshelper/Difficulty approach

Hello guys and I really want everyone to sit down and discuss this issue before anything serious develops and to minimize possible arguments and unprotect all the pages.

Here are some proposals to grade a difficulty:
 * My proposal:

Propose a change in the comments below.

Get everyone to discuss.

If more than 70% of the comments are agreeing with the idea, commit the change. (Neutral ones don't count.)

Look up at crushingcandies.com if there are a lot of users finding the level "hard" or "easy", at least 6 of them should have the similar comment.

Otherwise, hold a poll. However, poll is not the best because someone may play with it, marking the level as "very easy" when it is "insanely hard" or "insanely hard" when it is "very easy". Also, the poll may only apply to the small amount of people, which cannot represent the whole. The result should be measured by taking the median, not the mean or the average.

If these measures fail, my invented system will help mark the least possible difficulty. This will narrow the choices objectively.

"Insanely hard" and "very easy" can only be rated if most of the community find the level in the above described difficulty. That means, it should receive over 85% of support, neutral ones don't count.
 * What Lefty wants to bring about:

Centralize the difficulty into only Lefty can make decision of the level's difficulty. He may follow some comments and change the difficulty accordingly.
 * Another proposal:

Categorize difficulty into two areas into Lefty's perception and community's perception. In this way, Lefty can only interfere his own perception on the difficulty while the community's difficulty is selected by my proposal.
 * Another another proposal:

All difficulty should be set by using polls.

To prevent anyone from editing the difficulty easily, I moved it into a template, but it is following my scale, which means it may differ with the written one.