Talk:Level 380/Dreamworld/@comment-108.36.72.230-20140816223150/@comment-108.36.72.230-20140817173127

Thanks for your explanation of "still statistically impossible."

'''Unless I have misunderstood something, it appears to me that Dreamworld Level 276 on Facebook is NOT statistically impossible anymore. I am not sure about nerfs and how many moonstrucks were used in my own successfull attempt without boosters described below. '''

I've kept track of how many tries it takes me to pass every Dreamworld level and in most cases (including Level 276) how close I came with each attempt. I have never used any boosters to pass any level. I play strictly on Facebook.

On June 18, 2014 at 10:02 PM EST I passed Level 276 on my 52nd try without using any boosters. I received three stars and a score of 509,440 on Facebook. I did not at the time have a way to record videos as I play the games. (Subsequently I downloaded a test version of a program called Snagit which enabled me to do that but I chose not to purchase it when the trial expired because I was confused about the use of some of its features.)

I just checked and I see that someone with a YouTube ID of darafina posted a video of having completed it without boosters as I did and got a higher score than I got. This was posted on June 12, 2014, six days before I completed on Try 52.

[|Level 276 completed without boosters by darafina (thre stars, 602,880, Facebook)]

Prior to my successful 52nd try I was 64 away on my 50th try and only 5 away on my 28th try. (Wow, that was frustrating!)

On my other tries I was never closer than 167 away.

My point is -- and, Blueeighthnote, please let me know if you agree or disagree --  that 276 Dreamworld is no longer "still statistically impossible" ..... since I did it and darafina did it as displayed with a posted YouTube video.

Thanks!