Thread:Cinnabar The Evil Gem Chemist 55555555555555555550/@comment-3225604-20130915061558/@comment-3225604-20130917110403

And for Imamadmad's suggestion, I would have to say I would disagree with his counter-proposal as it promotes dictating the difficulty.

Yes, it can stop people from changing the difficulty easily using this method. However, have you ever thought what would happen if difficulty are not allowed to be changed?

If the permission of changing the difficulty is left to admins, that means admins can judge the difficulty without listening to others. This does not really tackle the root of the problem and I know this can be disastrous and really asks people to leave and even arouses more arguments.

You may say my idea is rubbish but that represents one of people's idea. Lefty's stance is strong and this means that our voices can be diminished and not be heard. I want Lefty to express his opinions as well and that's the reason why I suggested this idea.

Many difficulty has had a lot of contradiction with their existing difficulty, including level 45, level 100, level 103, level 104, level 109, level 165 and much more. By locking their difficulty, it is the same with banning freedom of speech.

I strongly oppose this idea as I think this will do no good but to promote dictatorship of difficulty.

I will propose a counter-proposal tonight.