Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150806111049/@comment-26235098-20150806112639

I have the same problem with this as when you first suggested it. I would support criteria for the top difficulty having something like 90% support for the rating and minimum of 15 comments. Only ones relevant are those of the current version, clearly.


 * Against point 1 - The cap of having to be in the poll should not be necessary. There may not be that many levels like this in the game, but I am against capping the number of levels to hold a given difficulty.


 * Against point 3 - Probability, stats, and the random factor, i.e. some lucky sod is going to throw the rating by passing in 10 goes and saying it's hard.

Deferring stance for now, but am inclined to oppose overall, because, as I said on Lefty's thread, I'm considering that our rating system doesn't allows for much more accuracy than the ratings we already have.