Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-17897872-20151127202940/@comment-26235098-20151128230004

Wildoneshelper wrote:

TBH, I was shocked to see this thread. It globs a lot of things together, and completely ignores the current voting policy which, despite its and complications, WAS voted in by consensus, and IS still in place. It would only take a few small amendments to smooth that process.

And while it seems an attempt was made before, there were simultaneously two active threads with two radically different yet overlapping proposals, creating almost a debate. I think it would be more productive to take our existing thing as a solid, known, (and working!) basis, and make tweaks to smooth it.

As for the list. SIGH. I have personally opposed two people on your list for ranks - giving very specific reasons. In one case, it was due to a values issue, dishonesty and disrespect, and I can't see nominating an admin under these conditions.... you are ready to vote them in! (Maybe you have already verified these conditions no longer apply... Maybe the user has improved. But if not, somebody needs to, or we will have a dishonest admin.)  There were additional, technical reasons too... again to be verified.

As for the deletions...

Storm? Reealy???? O_O And I haven't checked but I thought Mario was also active. And Imamadmad???? O_O