Thread:3primetime3/@comment-3225604-20160106121451/@comment-3225604-20160107084704

First, never have I thought that admins are "kings of admins", and the system does not intend to "glorify" this concept. I have proposed a revision to this system that registered users and bureaucrats can nominate a user to be an admin, so that it becomes easier. I think it has been a big misconception that the "recommendation letter" must include a blog post, and it is COMPLETELY NOT NECESSARY. Users can just ask other users for their support through messages and it's ok.

Second, I'm not questioning Rose ability but at least I think he needs to be voted publicly whether he should be a bureaucrat because mutual trust is very important for this position. I think there is a reason behind why some people oppose every time when they see the word "bureaucrat".

Lastly, I think I mean Rose needs to be proven trust to the community, not us.