Thread:3primetime3/@comment-23865306-20160724163944/@comment-17897872-20160724204316

I hope you know that the reason why wikia contributors are lashing at your comments is not because of your constructive analyses but because of the fact that your difficulty ratings at the end of your comment can sometimes drastically deviate from the common censensus.

A personal analysis is exactly what is needed on the difficulty section of the pages. That's why they are there. They are supposed to point out the downsides and upsides to each level, and you do that perfectly through your analyses. After reading what is in that section, the level can become easier after you've pointed out the potential pitfalls and some things that a player can take advantage of to pass the level. You don't have to try the level to know if it's accurate or not. Yes, your difficulties ratings are not perfect, which is why I don't consider it when I add difficulties to the levels pages. I hope you know that I wouldn't attempt to add in the sections to the pages if I didn't think they weren't good.

But I'll follow your requests to leave those sections of the page blank if you'd like. No problem. Why fill them in with cool information taken from the comments section? We don't need cool info! The page already looks cool with missing sections that no one wants to fill in.

Maybe someone else will like to share his/her analyses on that section and would want to be heard. But otherwise we'll be staring at some empty pages for a while. Guess users will have to be okay with that. We can wait patiently for a willing user to step it up and take the spotlight.