User blog comment:3primetime3/I feel like I am abusing my admin power, LOL/@comment-24142930-20131220112209/@comment-3225604-20131221121306

I believe stopping unregistered users is not a good way, and I will feel so sorry for those who are affected. If not unregistered users, will we even see the organization of different level pages so fast? I mean an unregistered user makes a lot of edits on level pages by organizing and compiling stuff. I encourage him/her to open up an account but s/he refuses to do so. Moreover, if not unregistered users, how will I improve or become a better person? I'm very glad that an unregistered user shown by the time pointing out my mistakes. Now, if you choose to protect pages, will it be beneficial to the wiki? Moreover, our popularity will then drop because we only allow registered users to edit, leading to a drop in WAM score. Our wiki is on the verge of dropping out of the top 100 and I will strongly oppose the enforcement of protecting pages like this. I can say there are a lot of better methods into dealing with the situation.

And remember, vandalism is inevitable, and if you choose to be scared, the wiki will be vandalized.

There are three solutions to this:

First, promote more users to be admins. In this way, more admins will be around to check the wiki's status. I will suggest Blueeighthnote, ChaoticCrush, and Liquoritz. These three come from different countries, and they are very active.

Second, allow registered users to block a user from editing temporary, like for 2 hours. Then, when someone is temporary blocked, a message will be sent to admins, and admins can have the right to block the person or not.

Third, ban the United Arab Emirates from editing this wiki. In this way, you will eventually block the whole family of the vandal and will significantly reduce the number of vandalism. Of course, they can choose to escape to other countries and I don't think this solution is good.

Lastly, you may not know if the vandals have multiple backup accounts. They may have made it a long time ago, which does not satisfy "block new and unregistered users", meaning they can still vandalize the wiki. And of course, new accounts will become old eventually and they can use them to vandalize the wiki. Then, the purpose of blocking new and unregistered users will become meaningless. By looking at some top wikis in the world (inc. Wikipedia), they do not ban unregistered users from editing. Especially for Wikipedia, where vandalism occurs much more frequently than here, is still available to editing for unregistered users. Therefore, if you choose to block all unregistered users, the wiki will become infamous of "rabbits" (they sleep in the race) of dealing with vandalism.