Board Thread:Wiki - Running & Policies/@comment-25122955-20170119150207/@comment-5232302-20170705141220

HM100 wrote: X~Calibur95 wrote: Hi all, I sent Fandom Support the following message, but the response I received doesn't seem to be promising, despite the fact that I gave them some links & some evidence. If we're going to need checkusers around here or any investigation at all, I need more back up.

Sent
I just visited Candy Crush Wiki and it turns out that one of the admin's userpage indicated a recent spike in vandalism and sockpuppetry. I did some research, and it turns out that the spike in sockpuppetry can be traced back to last year as of this writing, so the need for checkusers in that wiki is long overdue. According to this somewhat outdated thread, a good handful of users, including me, are interested in promoting 3primetime3 and Roseturnip to checkuser status. I have just met them on chat, and they all agreed with the promotion.

While you are at it, I would also like to request a sockpuppet investigation and a possible range block on the following users; a complete list can be found on my blog in the Age of Empires Wiki. If this list is too large for one person to manage, I would like to suggest another staff or VSTF to take a look at it. Thanks in advance!

Reply
So no checkusers here. BTW, what will happen if vandalsim warning turns out black?

I would agree with you. The staff should offer CheckUser rights if our vandalism warnings are becoming extremely high. Without it, we are probably going to get done for...