Board Thread:Local Games/@comment-7395353-20151106203233/@comment-27403314-20151114091259

Steve820 wrote: Btd456Creeper wrote: My number is still bigger than both of yours (not sure about Steve's though) Well, my number is in the same format as Graham's Number (the up-arrow notation and layers for example, the original format is here), but my number has, instead of 64 layers in the plain old Graham's Number, there's a Graham's Number of layers in my number! The exponents, instead of being 3 in Graham's number, is a super huge number of 10^100^100^100... and there is a Graham's Number of 100's in the exponents, in the number shown as a replacement of "3" in the original Graham's Number! And that super huge number (10^100^100...) is repeated in a Graham's Number of layers! This number is truly mindblowing. I don't think anyone can beat my number, no matter how hard they try. Unless if they copied everything you wrote and added '+1'.