User blog comment:Flockky II/I'm Almost Retiring/@comment-27028390-20141228103445/@comment-3225604-20141228142411

For what I know Flockky, Rose's block is not an abuse. I know you're going to hate seeing this, but this is what I've found. I hope Rose won't mind if I tell the whole story.

It is when Rose upgrades a level to insanely hard regardless of Olaf's strong opposition probably during when they are chatting, Olaf says WTF and Rose reacted. Then, Olaf also says the word "cactus" which offends Rose a lot. They both start to annoy each other and warns each other to stop doing that.

Olaf also annoys Rose but Rose does do that to Olaf.

Olaf should be blocked longer than Rose according to the above incident. Yet, Rose should not have revenged or intimidated him again even though he did. Witnesses said Rose is very calm in his reactions. However, Lefty claims that at least three users have complained about their argument and suggested them to PM rather than mainspace to avoid disturbing. The main reason why Rose should be blocked for 2 hours is that he should not retaliate. Olaf should be blocked longer for annoying Rose. I know what I'm typing this right now can be tempting to you but if you just let the argument go on and disturb the main chat room, is it really worth? Retaliation should not be an excuse. If someone offends you, then you should report to an admin. Although it may sound ridiculous to say "cactus" is offensive, we may not know how the offended feels. Next time, Rose should not try to take revenge by doing almost the same thing as the offender. Olaf should not intimidate Rose again, though I think he is intimidated also by Rose's revenge.

I'm sorry if I have made something wrong here, but I hope everyone can calm down (old saying...) and think you have done wrong.