Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150129143201/@comment-25355185-20150201111624

Lefty7788 wrote: NicePlace1192 wrote: 1. for Very Hard+ proposition.

I find that some "insanely hard" levels or past versions are not that insane as I can still work out how to finish them in case if I am lucky. For instance, only those that make me feel having no idea of how to succeed deserve insanely hard.

2. as I think no approach is universally acceptable.

3. as it is technically not difficult. By the way, Extraordinarily hard could be another alternative name to Very Hard+. We already have Insanely Hard for that. If the original levels 655, 677 and 829 are truly insanely hard, then levels 755, 765 and the like are a bit easier than them, in my opinion. If you have experienced them, you'll understand the difference. Sorry for my arrogance.

My advice would be to check the Hardest Level in Reality list and see how the orders of magnitude in difficulty of different levels differ.