Thread:5.63.151.36/@comment-14966981-20160218111602

I saw your message to me a while ago about a request. I may stop, reserved for only critical leaking conditions. But actually, nowadays, you might see Episodes 105, 106, 107, 108 and 109 in articles. Yes, those editors finding them out are a form of leaking, but does not mean that those editors are already played in an episode where leaking lasted. It was just normally fine - you should have been exactly grateful to know advancely the episodes we're going to play on. And one last thing, I do not call this a critical leak since the leaked episode articles do not mention the actual episode name and champion title. I will call it as legitimate, however, there's nothing wrong with it.

If you're asking me if I do leaking, yes a bit, but no more further than the advanced editors. Happy staying and next time, request to me properly by not in a form of insult to the editors saying scumbags. 