Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20150619060400/@comment-3225604-20150620042443

Catinthedark wrote:

Edit count -- I see no harm in it, and it helps weed out novices. IMHO the proposal requiring 900 mainspace and 1500 total edits is low enough that if a user is half way interested in Wiki content (CCS) -- and they should be, to merit admin rights -- they will have this without even trying.

Admin Participation --

Receive 80% votes from admins and 70% support votes from admins The threads are long and content has evolved. ;)

Blocks -- Each of your suggestions offers something the other lacks.

I slightly prefer "no blocks in the last year". If someone is a repeat offender... what are the odds they can lie low for that long, just to request admin? You could combine your solutions, by adding a safety clause to the "no blocks in a year rule", such as:

"Candidates having > 2 blocks in their history will be admitted only if two of three bureaucrats establish that the misbehavior, cause of the block history, no longer applies to the user, and provided the third bureaucrat does not oppose."

Seems to be much more better than the initial one.