Thread:Munkondi/@comment-12690164-20160621022308/@comment-76.234.232.48-20160621183818

Signing out to post this because I'm still getting a thread post glitch every time Rose posts. Hope this solves soon.

I would like to start off with a comment to the users who started the thread. Maybe users have a different opinion towards others, but that does not give you the right in any way to threaten another user. Please assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Assume that they are here to positively contribute to the wiki and that every comment is made in good faith.

Again, I'll end by paraphrasing Rose. What everyone's trying to say in a much harsher tone is this. Please watch what you type before clicking post. Maybe you mean a different way, but others may take offense in what you type. Feel free to reply to Flockky's comment like the Wikia contributor's comment on level 1753.
 * Lucas, I'm glad that you found the comments that are rather impolitely directed at another user. Based on how this warning message is going, this is a first warning, and it shouldn't be taken too harshly.  A first warning should not include a comment from you that a user is "a nasty, selfish, jealous keyboard warrior who thinks that attacking Flockky is cool."  If this comment was pointed towards you, that you were such a user, how would you react to it?  Maybe you're right, but please watch how you come off to other users, even through messages like this.
 * Thegreattttt, users are only blocked indefinitely for "the consistent" harassing of other users and breaking of Wikia policy. I don't see consistent disruption towards the user's comments for this to be proven yet.  Also, do not use blocks as a threat or punishment.  Blocks are only used to prevent disruption of the project.
 * Marisa, it's been stated above. If you don't have any nicer way to put it, it would be better if you didn't post at all.  Maybe this situation has been going on for a long time, but this was the first time that the user has been warned on his wall.
 * Not real name, he probably doesn't think he's "annoying" people, so you may wish to elaborate on this :).
 * Rose, thank you for your objectivity.
 * Not real name, it would be great if you would be able to call someone annoying with a reason lol :P
 * Cheekian, because of how poorly this was handled, I feel that no action will be taken against Monkondi.
 * Munkondi, everyone's just trying to tell you this with each comment but are just too clouded because of their anger. I'll state this objectively without any bias.
 * Level 1759 comment: For example, the +1 comment supports the fact that Flockky's comment is BS. This was a slight bit rude, even though the comment itself does not state anything like it.
 * Level 1760: I don't see any disrespect in this comment and I don't know why it was cited against you.
 * Level 1754 - Your comment is vague here and is probably the reason why it was cited against you. Are you laughing at his response here or at how hard the level is?
 * Level 1755 - I don't see any problem with this comment because another user commented with an oppose first. To cite an oppose with a user, you should use the Support, Neutral, or Oppose templates and think of a good reason to counter it.  A simple "LMAO" or "ROTLMAO" does not really give anything and can only be taken the wrong way.
 * Level 1753 - this was rather mean of you and everyone else was right here. If you disagree with something, do not say that a user does not have credibility.
 * Level 1752 - you probably had no intention to insult Flockky here, but if you notice, Flockky responded with a "-_-", which means he did take offense. Please explain your point of view and state that you don't direct any offense towards Flockky if this happens.
 * Level 1752 - "Busted again." Maybe you mean this jokingly, but I can't see it.  Gigibaby and Flockky don't see it either.  Care to elaborate on the comments there?
 * Level 1748 - nothing wrong with this comment. This comment is not offensive.  Yes, any user completing an insanely hard level in one try is laughable, and I don't see this as any different.
 * Level 1723 - Your comment does imply that Flockky is a cheat here and is a directed insult.
 * Level 1724 - Your comment does imply that Flockky is a cheat here and is a directed insult.
 * Level 1692 - Nothing wrong with this comment. However, remember that if you're friends with everyone on this wiki, plus outside of this wiki, who actively play Candy Crush, that's an easy 100 lives there easy if they build up.
 * Level 1685 - Racing is the fun of the game. That's why Candy Crush posts to you where other users are for competition.  That is in no way childish.

Thank you.

Primetime