Thread:Blueeighthnote/@comment-3225604-20131013091410

The difficulty is often toggled to what community is not aiming for. I would like to propose that the difficulty is secured. Everything should have been set already in a sandbox. The proposal is here:

The difficulty is based on User:Wildoneshelper/Sandbox/Levels, which has the initial difficulty not interfered by anyone or everyone who decides what difficulty the level should be. I'm sorry for Lefty if any of the difficulty does not best describes his current situation, but I think it minimizes any single arguments that could have been made.

Changes may be added:

1. If Lefty keeps changing the difficulty without referring to what the community thinks, I may have to move it to a global template, which everyone has the same right to edit it.

Oh, the difficulty does not best describes the current situation, what should I do?

No problem, I have never said the difficulty is fixed. Indeed, it is not. You can propose a change in the comments below. Do really voice out your proposals as the difficulty will remain and will not change unless you want to. Remember: changes are impossible without actions. Therefore, please do voice out your proposals and maybe someone will support you. At least there should be 2 fors and 70% of fors in order to commit this change.

Even though the level is nerfed, please do not change the difficulty by your own, because we may not know if this redesigned level is known to be "easier" by other users or not. Therefore, you still need to propose a change.

However, if you want to voice out your opinions, you can edit under "comments" section, which I want to suggest. In this way, locking pages will seem to be unreasonable and autocratic. Yes, and I want to prove that locking pages are unreasonable and autocratic.

I look forward for your reply soon and tell me what you think, because Imamadmad is urging me to carry out the plan as soon as I got a general support. 