Thread:Munkondi/@comment-12690164-20160621022308/@comment-26042748-20160621131857

reply to LucasH181

(who conveniently for himself closed the thread after making these comments to the points I raised above)

1. By slandering Flockky through using unlimited lives and boosters (which is not even claimed evident, yet.), you have already broke the rules for spreading untrue rumours about other users.

Where is your example of a slanderous comment I made or spreading untrue (sic) rumours about other users? Still waiting for that.

Meanwhile LucasH181, you have already breached the following rule "Abuse, harass, threaten or intimidate other Wikia users" and I have several recorded examples of this already.

As an admin, you should be especially careful of how that applies to your own conduct.

''2. I don't see how I am being aggressive and leaving threatening messages on your wall. Because if that's the case, I seriously think you haven't see enough of 'aggresive stuff'. And before you can blame me for being nasty towards you, look at how you have treated Flockky. ''

You keep making this claim about how I have 'treated' Flockky but I am still waiting for your example of this. I repeat, if you can give me a valid example of what you're alleging then I will apologise, until then you're making false and libellous allegations.

Once again as admin you should not be taking sides and using bans and deletions as a threat.

''3.  You said that you have responded towards Flockky's extraordinary remarks 'politely'. Yeah, if this was polite, that hurling profanities everywhere would be 'kindness'. And by slandering others for using unlimited lives and boosters, this isn't '''polite. It's pure rudeness'''. And through your opinions towards Flockky, you're putting him down.''

Yet again you make these allegations but provide no evidence whatsoever. Until you do, your allegations are without any substance and it looks like you're just taking sides.

''4. Again, I don't see how am I using threatening language. And my colleagues are just standing up for injustice.''

And still yet again you make an allegation of injustice with evidence.

For your information, I have screenshots of yours and Flockky's cheerleaders' threatening language.

''5. I'm glad you can positively accept what Flockky has been doing to the wiki. And, in fact you have no evidence to support that Flockky is hacking the game. Some people have tremendous luck, that's all. In fact, I might conclude that you are just jealous.''

Incorrect.

Nobody said Flockky was hacking the game. The allegation (not made by me) was that he had access to high numbers of lives and boosters, either through favours or through buying them with cash. Based on his own comments and claims this was later proven to be true by other board members (once again, not me).

What you, me or anyone else chooses to believe is true, is a matter for personal opinion. But you should know that a lot of people here consider his claims to be making a mockery of the board.

And by the way, why would I be jealous? This isn't a competion that anyone can win. That accusation alone betrays your personal bias, to be quite honest.

''6. Pot calling the kettle black, huh? In fact, you are the one who started all this. In CCSW, we are supposed to have a positive environment for all, and not put others down (just like you). And my 'colleagues' and I are just people fighting for justice. In fact, through all your words and action, you are actually hurting Flockky. If you are going to say we have hurt you or something, why not you take a look at Flockky? Through all your claims, you're not credible as well. And if you're gonna complain to wikia.com, or even king.com, go ahead. I'm not going to be threatened by your terrorizing actions. The rules are up there, and it's you who broke them. I definitely don't find fault with my actions, since I'm purely just standing up for those who are bullied. And the day block is for you to turn over a new leaf, and not to continue stir up trouble again. ''

It is a positive environment until you start applying threats and hammers against perfectly reasoned commenters whose opinions you merely disagree with. Using overblown language like 'terrorizing' only serves to undermine your neutrality.

If you're comfortable about me bringing up this issue and your questionable use and problematic application of the board's admin privileges at wikia.com, then I will gladly do that.

''Nuff said. ''

Indeed.