Board Thread:Wiki Running/@comment-3225604-20160106132717/@comment-52.27.76.164-20160111032336

I support your above proposal you just typed (yay!), although I would heighten it to 10 votes instead of 6. I still think 20 is too many. 7/10 looks pretty good. We also never know if there is a "thinning of the herd" at any time. Nomination is very tiny now, which isn't a big deal like the voting round. However, I'm afraid of IP users counting at the moment due to sockpuppets, users randomly posting oppose because he feels like it, etc. However, if an IP address has been contributing here for a long time, maybe.

About the different stances a user can give, may I only propose only support or oppose? If a user is undecided, the neutral should be used, but it should not affect the support or oppose rate, OR the 10 users under voting. If the user doesn't know the one under voting, then he/she does not vote! :) The other stance templates shouldn't be used.

@Cat, I sign in to post things when I feel like myself. I do occasionally. I decided to stay out of my account from posts like this. If I go glancing at my contributions list, I don't wanna see this :P. I often also use my iPad for these things. When I was logged in recently, my cousin moved Level 252 to a weird name using my account. Strange.

In general, if we are using the method Wildones just proposed here, I support.