Talk:Level 96/Dreamworld/@comment-16894369-20140303122526/@comment-84.135.243.240-20140519163526

After reading Roses comments regarding various levels it appears she'd have to be literally bored by most of them - or is it due to the majority of CCSO players being not as skilled?. As in, rating levels 67 or 95 "easy"... come on, this is clearly not appropriate. We all get to enjoy the rub of the green sometimes, apart from the fact that many levels are decided by just getting a good or bad board. So do we agree that an objective estimate is necessary? "Very easy" should describe a level where it's likely to win 92%+, same goes for "Insanely hard" (extremely high chance of fail attempt even with careful planning of movements)