Talk:Level 786/@comment-108.36.72.230-20141226161259

I am the poster formerly known as HappyCrusher1. I have some thoughts here.

Most levels in these higher levels of CandyCrush are almost totally luck. The game is rigged. That's R-I-G-G-E-D. I have absolutely no doubt about this, none whatsoever.

The so-called RNG? It's not really random at all.

Any level, no matter what the "official" difficulty is, can be beaten on the very first try IF the King application allows you to do so.

I find so many of the difficulty levels here totally bogus.

I also find it ridiculous when someone says "beat it immediately, therefore easy" or words to that effect.

The only way to get a truly accurate difficulty rating is to play the level 100 times. You could beat it on Try 1 and fail on the next 99 tries. Yes, there are exceptions. Occasionally there is a ridiculously easy level. But in most cases, you cannot accurately rate a level unless you play it multiple times. Of course, hardly any Candy Crusher plays a level multiple times.

I did on one occasion beat an :"insanely hard" level on the very first try. I have on a fw occasions beaten a "very hard" level on the very first try. But, until now, I have never metioned that here. Why? Because I don't want to make anyone feel bad and also I fully realize that my success came about because the application let me win, not because I was skillful. Convrsely I have, on occasion, taken over 50 tries to complete levels that are in the "easy" category.

The application is fun but the RNG is anything but random. To me this game is more lilke a glorified slot machine than anything else.

By the way, I have never hit the booster jackpot. Not even once. Obviously that is anything but random as well.

I have already made 40 tries at this level and came close (within 10 jellies) twice. Yet so many people here are claiming it is relatively easy. How many of those people would be willing to play it 40 times and tell me how many times they completed it? My guess is zero.