FANDOM


  • Catinthedark
    Catinthedark closed this thread because:
    Sufficient votes with clear consensus: User:Emmaelise401 is promoted to Discussions Moderator.
    18:50, September 15, 2016

    Please Read The Whole Thread

    Hello. everyone probably knows that I am Emma. I have been showing up around the wiki a lot more and have been trying to cause less and less drama. (At least, I hope), I am applying for forum moderator so I can help with handling the eversomany user rights requests. I am pretty sure you know that when I make a vote in a request for user right thread, it usually changes the thing. I strive to actually put detail into my work. Not just slap on a "Why not", and be done with it. (No offense to you, red). I truly just know I can once again be a help to this wiki. It has been 2 years since my unblock, 2 months since my ressurection, I believe that I can do this job properly.

    -- This bottom part is signed by me saying that I will not fight against any opposes, and if I get rejected, I will continue to strive for amazingness. If I get accepted, my loyalty in CCSW will continue and I will try my best to keep everything balanced. -- 

    Edit: Removed the support and oppose policy, it makes my greedy.


    Thank you.

      Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      You are good at catching inappropriate comments and your forum activity, past is the past, you seem to have changed


      EDITED on September 10.

        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      I don't care the dramas that happened to you before (bygones are bygones), there's always good in everyone. I trust that you are capable for this role. :)
        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      Seems you have changed after some incidents :) But I haven't seen you these days?
        Loading editor
    • Edwin91476 wrote:

      Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      Seems you have changed after some incidents :) But I haven't seen you these days?

      School. Sorry.

        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-down-iconOppose
      I see you did drama with leo in a day which made the inabillity to get discussion mod because I think you may abuse it like the admin rights
        Loading editor
    • This is my true opinion...

      Emma, I

      Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      as you may have cause dramas in the past, but you've change in the past 2 months :)
        Loading editor
    • Maw, thanks Olaf.

        Loading editor
    • If you all are here, how about going to chat now?

        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      For dramas, forget it. Everyone can change oneself.
        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      I have seen that you are able to handle contrast and misunderstanding with others more calmly and civilly, even after repeated provocation, which is no small feat. This improvement suggests you could be a responsible discussion mod at this point, and you do deserve recognition for it, especially as a regularly present and dedicated contributor here.


      A caution: in regards to your previous mod request, I was also concerned with you wanting to close threads prematurely or for inadequate reasons. Your recent improvements hopefully will apply to this issue as well, but just bear it in mind if promoted, please.

      Good work and good luck!

      Catinthedark (talk) 16:55, September 9, 2016 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      I find you suitable for this position.
        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      I think you may deserve this rights based on your comment and forum activity.
        Loading editor
    • Anyway, all the FINAL results will be posted in 17th, September including NRN, Emma, Me, Mossy, Carl and Lucas.

        Loading editor
    • Changed to

      Sort-neutralNeutral
      For good user now
        Loading editor
    • Edwin91476 wrote: Anyway, all the FINAL results will be posted in 17th, September including NRN, Emma, Me, Mossy, Carl and Lucas.

      I think mine will be on September 25 because adminidtrator voting rounds are 15 days.

        Loading editor
    • Not real name wrote:

      Edwin91476 wrote: Anyway, all the FINAL results will be posted in 17th, September including NRN, Emma, Me, Mossy, Carl and Lucas.

      I think mine will be on September 25 because adminidtrator voting rounds are 15 days.

      OKay. I already posted results.

        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      Despite of the dramas, I don't think it's a handrance for you to rank as discussion mod. You are good at this ability I know that.
        Loading editor
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:07, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:07, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:07, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • NOTE: Do not count this vote yet. I haven't made up my mind.

      Either

      Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      or 
      
      Thumbs-up-iconSupport to Sort-neutralNeutral

      This one's a tough one for me to decide. Certainly, Emma, you have improved. And I'm happy about that. But I'm just not too sure if you are ready for this rank yet. Don't forget that not too long ago, it seemed you were just about ready to quit CCSW, after you demoted yourself from rollback. You history hasn't been very pleasant either, although it's getting better. And I still don't know if you'll cause drama, unintentionally or not. If you get promoted, then great! But if you don't, then just keep contributing in the future and you should be able to get it! :)

        Loading editor
    • I would like to make a formal apology for releasing NRN's comments on chat, but, I only did it because the admin team should not act like that. I care extremely deep about this wiki, and I don't want someone who could possibly be homophobic to be admin. Again, I completely apoloize for this action, and I suppose I could just delete the comments on NRN's admin thread and forget this whole thing ever happened. 

        Loading editor
    • Emmaelise401 wrote:
      I would like to make a formal apology for releasing NRN's comments on chat, but, I only did it because the admin team should not act like that. I care extremely deep about this wiki, and I don't want someone who could possibly be homophobic to be admin. Again, I completely apoloize for this action, and I suppose I could just delete the comments on NRN's admin thread and forget this whole thing ever happened. 

      If an admin found doing this, you may get demoted unless it is spam or insulating.

        Loading editor
    • Im no longer posting replies in my nomination

        Loading editor
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:07, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:07, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:08, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • It was not on a PM, or a facebook, it was legitimately on chat. 

      He even said in a comment "I didn't think LGBT was allowed in wikia" 

        Loading editor
    • Is it possible you can find a screenshot of it?

      Because I removed all opposes due to the situation with NRN, I'll do so with yours pretty soon after you get a chance to see this message. For users who voted oppose because of the incident yesterday, your post will be removed unless you change your reason.

      Asides from what happened last night, you've been such a better user lately, and I'll support you for discussions mod.

      -Primetime

        Loading editor
    • Hi prime, sadly no screenshots were taken because the bot wasn't on and I wasn't being paticularly smart at the time, lol. I have three eyewitnesses. Storm, Olaf, and Asew. I wasn't trying to sabatoge NRN, I was simply opposing because being homophobic is an absolutely major rule. The more mature thing to do would have been to not post on the NRN for admin thread and just move on, but. I choose the stupid path once again. Lol.

        Loading editor
    • Emmaelise401 wrote: Hi prime, sadly no screenshots were taken because the bot wasn't on and I wasn't being paticularly smart at the time, lol. I have three eyewitnesses. Storm, Olaf, and Asew. I wasn't trying to sabatoge NRN, I was simply opposing because being homophobic is an absolutely major rule. The more mature thing to do would have been to not post on the NRN for admin thread and just move on, but. I choose the stupid path once again. Lol.

      Yes so I might put back my stance. I removed it due to yesterday incident.

        Loading editor
    • 3primetime3
      3primetime3 removed this reply because:
      Based on reply one day ago.
      17:08, September 11, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • I have removed certain opposes and neutrals that were stated because of the incident. If you would like to oppose the user, please DO NOT INCLUDE yesterday's incident as a reason. Thank you, and please vote again!

      -Primetime

        Loading editor
    • Seems I only have supports / nuetrals. Good sign, can't lie.

        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      You have my support. Don't worry about the drama!
        Loading editor
    • Thumbs-down-iconOppose
      Sorry, but no. I still think Emma will cause another drama soon...
        Loading editor
    • Felix Vašečka wrote:
      Thumbs-down-iconOppose
      Sorry, but no. I still think Emma will cause another drama soon...

      Move from there now. If prime founds it again,  your stance will again be removed.

      Thumbs-up-iconSupport
      Past drama not count
        Loading editor
    • So far the votes are pretty much unaminous 

        Loading editor
    • I think still

      Thumbs-up-iconSupport to Sort-neutralNeutral
      I trust you won't cause dramas later, but the case just before you are saying the fact, but your stance is wrong.
        Loading editor
    • I meant Unaminous as in mostly supports

        Loading editor
    • Catinthedark
      Catinthedark removed this reply because:
      Did not come across in the spirit I intended.
      19:52, September 14, 2016
      This reply has been removed
    • Cat, really?

        Loading editor
    • No offense intended, Emma. I meant well, but you know what, nvm.

        Loading editor
    • And the results are a bingo! The promotion should happen soon

        Loading editor
    • RESULTS: 11 Supports to 1 Oppose.

      Detailed breakdown of results, including HM100's change from Oppose to Support:

      • 11 Supports
      • 1 Oppose
      • 2 ambiguous/discarded (tho worth noting both on positive side)
        • Felix posted twice, first support, then Support-Neutral.
        • 3lite is undecided between Support and Support-Neutral.

      Congratulations, Emma!

      I have promoted you, and will now close this thread.

        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.